The word Rosebud suggests nearly the opposite of all that defines Mr. Kane's mystifying hard exterior and cold, private persona. When I think, of rosebud I think of the color pink of course, which reminds me of healthy and happy things, rosy childhood memories and such. This thought connects instantly with the literal meaning of rosebud, the sleigh he played with before being taken away from his home and submerged into the active, non-rosy, greedy, real world. The meaning of Rosebud makes me think that his childhood was his most beloved period, which was maybe the last in which he expressed raw emotion since he clearly did not want to be disrupted from his carefree childhood fun.
The ending of the film is quite satisfying as the circle of stories of Kane's life is concluded with the displacement of furniture in the Kane castle. The angle of this scene is very captivating since all of Kane's statues, luxurious furnitures and others resemble the view of an incredible city with skyscrapers. The city looks abandoned and lifeless just like Kane was with inner desolation, trapped inside his own luxurious possessions. The literal meaning of "Rosebud" is revealed which ignites other connections further disclosing little by little on Kane's character.
I enjoyed seeing the film very much. The technical aspects do not particularly impress me themselves because these are very common in modern films. I do value this film is the cause of that; its technical and story-line innovations it brought transformative significance for the film industry in general. The story-line's theme deal a lot with the exterior influences, like money and social status and stigma, strong effect on the psyche of the raw individual. Aesthetically, it is very intriguing and even beautiful, the angles and light and juxtaposed shadow inter play do not cease to be striking and subtle at the same time. The film manages to combine casual, everyday scenes ( such as the breakfast one, although lavishly) and dramatic ones as well; not being too real, for it to lack entertainment, or too fantastic, or too active, as in with too much drama.
I agree that we are not very aware of them, but I think its because were fairly used to them in modern films.I wonder if people when the saw the film at its release felt the same. As the statement says, modern films demand that we notice their special effects because most are not looking out for what is visually exciting. Most, or some, I am not sure what the surveys would say, would seek for the substance, in other words, all the different things the film may express, and sometimes how these connect with the viewer's personal associations. In judging a film wholly, the content is what must impact or affect, emotionally even in some way the viewer. Special effects are an addition to the medium, I don't feel they are to be the center of attention. For that, anyone person who knows the techniques could be admired.
I agree that we are not very aware of them, but I think its because were fairly used to them in modern films.I wonder if people when the saw the film at its release felt the same. As the statement says, modern films demand that we notice their special effects because most are not looking out for what is visually exciting. Most, or some, I am not sure what the surveys would say, would seek for the substance, in other words, all the different things the film may express, and sometimes how these connect with the viewer's personal associations. In judging a film wholly, the content is what must impact or affect, emotionally even in some way the viewer. Special effects are an addition to the medium, I don't feel they are to be the center of attention. For that, anyone person who knows the techniques could be admired.